28 ICRAV 2026 Expert witnesses in the sporting disciplinary context are very important people. More often than not, the whole case turns around the expert evidence which often comes from competing perspectives. Judges and non-judicial decision makers will usually have no scientific background and are entitled to, and do, expect to receive objective and substantial assistance from the experts who appear before them. Experts are expected to: • be appropriately qualified; and • confine their opinions to their particular field of expertise; and • resist the temptation to be an advocate for the party using their services. Keep answers brief (if possible) and on point; and • prepare a thorough report or statement of their opinion setting out the assumptions upon which the opinion is based, and all the steps that lead to the ultimate opinion; and • remain calm and objective in the witness box and not to argue with the cross-examiner; and • adhere to the relevant code of conduct for the particular tribunal or court in which the evidence is to be heard; and • specify if an opinion is provisional; and • not only give the appearance of impartiality but to actually be impartial. The expert’s overarching duty is to assist the court or tribunal. ABSTRACT What Judges Want Justice Forrest is a former judge of the Supreme Court of Victoria and currently serves as a Reserve Judge following his retirement in August 2023. He was appointed to the Court of Appeal in 2018 after nearly a decade in the Trial Division. Before joining the bench, he practised as a barrister for over 25 years, specialising in criminal law, personal injury, and professional negligence, and was appointed Queen’s Counsel in 1999. His career included involvement in major criminal and civil matters, high-profile sporting tribunal cases, and regular appearances for Victorian Stewards across multiple racing codes. Justice Terry Forest Supreme Court of Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTI3ODI1