Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  6 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

Introduction

6

Inside News

The role of clinical radiology in medical

practice has increased substantially in

recent years, primarily due to the much

greater anatomical, functional and

diagnostic information provided by this

discipline. The introduction and growth

of multiple imaging techniques such as

CT, MRI and PET is largely responsible

for this but the increasing scope of

interventional radiology has also

greatly influenced patient care and has

attracted much attention from healthcare

providers and other clinical disciplines.

Beyond image interpretation, clinical

radiologist roles now extend to advice

regarding further imaging investigations

when an abnormality is detected,

consultation with doctors and patients

regarding the potential role of biopsy

and interventional radiology, and

participation in discussions of patient

investigation, management and follow-

up. The clinical value of radiology is

exemplified by the increasing trend

toward multidisciplinary meetings, where

radiologists are now at the forefront of

decision making. While the above make

this discipline exciting, clinical radiology

and its practitioners face continuing

change and this will bring many

challenges and opportunities as I discuss

briefly below.

The Overall Context

Clinical radiology is conducted within

the context of broader healthcare

systems and is significantly influenced

by them. At the outset, it therefore

seems appropriate to mention some

of the challenges being faced by

healthcare systems in countries similar

to those in New Zealand and Australia

before focusing more closely on clinical

radiology.

These global challenges include:

• An ageing population with evolving

disease patterns and an increasing

burden of chronic illness

• Rapid evolution of technology and

increasing focus upon assessment of

health technologies

• Expansion of medical knowledge and

available therapies

• Rising demand for services partly due

to increasing patient and societal

expectations

• Greater focus upon patient safety and

quality of care

• Problems with health workforce supply

and distribution

• Rapid rise in healthcare costs in an

environment of cost containment

• Increasing interest by governments to

transition from fee for service payment

systems to alternative systems such as

value based care.

Innovation in Technology

The rate of innovation and technological

change in radiology exceeds that of

many other specialties. Significant

contributors to this include the

development of new technologies and

an increase in their clinical scope. By way

of example ultrasound elastography,

digital breast tomosynthesis and PET are

examples of technologies in different

stages of evolution, the latter being

relatively well established. An ongoing

challenge faced by clinical radiology

within Australia and New Zealand is

access to funding for imaging studies

that are supported and a part of routine

clinical care in other countries. Reliance

upon demonstration of evidence of

cost effectiveness using the same

framework as that used to assess

medical therapies is unlikely to prove

fruitful for imaging and the Medical

Services Advisory Committee process

has been problematic for many years.

Improvements may be forthcoming as

a result of the MBS Review process but

funding of new technology is likely to

remain challenging for many years.

Beyond the increasing range of imaging

modalities and the physical principles

they exploit, increasing computer power

now enables rapid image processing

as well as development and use of

more sophisticated algorithms. These

algorithms are beginning to impact

upon the perceptual phase of image

interpretation, for example, in the setting

of lung nodule detection on CT images.

While this may be welcome in view

of the burgeoning number of images

radiologists are exposed to daily, others

who have a simplistic understanding of

clinical radiology may regard matters

differently. Such developments may be

regarded as an opportunity to potentially

replace clinical radiologist skills, utilise

other disciplines to make cost savings

and even deploy computers to interpret

images in future.

Continuing this theme, centralisation of

clinical data and improved connectivity

between radiology systems, electronic

medical records, laboratory and other

hospital information is increasingly

Challenges and

Opportunities in

Clinical Radiology

Prof John Slavotinek