Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  16 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

Research

16

Inside News

RANZCR Research

Grants in Action

The College offers grant funding

to support radiology and radiation

oncology research projects. In 2013, I

was fortunate enough to receive funding

for a project titled, ‘Comprehensive

non-contrast-enhanced MRA evaluation

of peripheral arterial disease in Type 2

diabetes’.

Type 2 diabetes is increasing in

prevalence due to the global

obesity epidemic, and peripheral

vascular disease (PVD) is a common

complication. PVD contributes to

diabetic foot ulceration, which limits

patient mobility and can lead to limb

loss and ultimately death in severe

cases. Imaging the lower limb arteries

is vital in the management of diabetic

patients with PVD, to assess the

location and severity of narrowing, plan

for surgical bypass or endovascular

revascularisation, and to identify

patients who might be best managed

conservatively, potentially saving them

from an invasive diagnostic angiogram.

Contrast-enhanced CTA is fast and

comprehensive, and is commonly used

to image PVD. However, it can be

challenging in diabetic patients where

renal impairment is common, making

potentially nephrotoxic iodinated

contrast agents undesirable. PVD

manifests as calcified plaque and affects

the vessels below the knee in diabetic

patients, rendering CT assessment

difficult. Magnetic resonance

angiography (MRA) offers a radiation

free alternative, and a number of non-

contrast-enhanced MRA techniques

have recently been developed in

response to concerns about the toxicity

of gadolinium-based contrast agents.

The main aim of the project was to

assess the accuracy of one such non-

contrast MRA method in Type 2 diabetic

patients presenting with symptomatic

peripheral arterial disease, comparing it

to the gold standard, digital subtraction

angiography (DSA).

There were a number

of secondary questions,

including determining

how confident two

radiologists were

at interpreting the

images, how reliable

the test was if looked

at by different readers,

and how acceptable

the non-contrast MRA

was to patients.

Over 18 months, we

recruited 30 patients

planned for diagnostic

or therapeutic DSA, who were imaged

with a non-contrast MRA prior to DSA.

Patients were also surveyed on their

MRA and DSA experience after each

examination.

Our results were interesting. 28 patients

completed the study—one could

not fit completely within the MRI due

to morbid obesity, and one patient

could not complete the MRA due to

discomfort. Overall, the non-contrast

MRA was most accurate in assessing

the iliac and femoral vessels, with

accuracy decreasing for the more distal

vessels, particularly the pedal arteries.

However, readers felt more confident

in assessing the calf arteries with MRA

than with DSA, highlighting some of

the challenges of DSA, where the distal

vessels can be difficult to visualise due

to technical or patient factors. They were

least confident in interpreting imaging

of the feet, where vessels are small

and motion is common. As might be

expected, patients reported less overall

pain and anxiety with MRA compared

with DSA.

Results from different facets of the

project have been presented to our

peers at the Radiological Society of

North America, the International Society

for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,

the Asian Society for Cardiovascular

Imaging, and shared with our vascular

surgery colleagues at the Australian

and New Zealand Society for Vascular

Imaging, with one manuscript submitted

and a second one in preparation.

Research is at times challenging and

results not something that are achieved

overnight. It is undoubtedly a team

effort, involving nursing, administrative,

radiography and medical staff. Not to

mention patients who kindly give their

time for the promise of improved care

for future patients. However, it is a

potentially educational and extremely

rewarding experience—apart from

myself, this project also provided

trainees with invaluable research

experience, of vital importance to the

future of our discipline.

This project would not have been

possible without the support of my

department and the College. I would

encourage anyone with an interesting

idea to take advantage of the

opportunity a research grant offers.

A/Prof Ruth Lim

Austin Health