Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  13 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

13

It was Different in the 1950s

Formula One was very different in the 1950s. The rules were much simpler for one thing!

Today the rules specify everything but the colour of the drivers' underwear, and I'm not 100%

sure about that. Engines are only part of a hybrid "power unit" and the

rules lay down the number of cylinders, the configuration and even the

spacing between the cylinder bores!

Signores Colombo, Jano, Lampredi and the

rest would have been horrified. In 1954 the

new Formula One specified engines of up to

2500 cc if unsupercharged or up to 750 cc supercharged. How the

designer achieved that and what the car looked like were up to him.

The cars that rolled on to the Grand Prix grids in

1954 were enormously varied. Engines had any

even number from four to eight cylinders.

Chassis were built up from steel tube but only the

Mercedes-Benz (M-B) had a full space frame. All

cars were front engined and rear drive except the entirely unsuccessful

DB Monomille, which was front wheel drive with the engine mounted

ahead of the front wheels! DB was one of only two marques that took advantage of the 750 cc

supercharged option. The other was the Italian Giaur, which raced only once.

Rear suspension on all but one of the competitive cars was some variation

on the De Dion rear axle. M-B had a low pivot swing axle system. All the

leading cars had wishbone front suspension and wire wheels and drum

brakes were almost universal. Connaught had "corners by Dunlop", alloy

wheels and disc brakes from that company.

Connaught and M-B shared two unusual features. Both

had fuel injected engines and both presented fully streamlined cars with

enclosed wheels. Connaught was the only team with its own wind tunnel,

so it is not surprising that the British car had the more effective shape. The

German car suffered from what the late L.J.K Setright called "aerodynamic oversteer" that was

countered by designing a huge amount of understeer into the suspension. That worked alright

at Reims and Monza but made the car a real pig to drive around Silverstone.

Connaught's problem was more practical. To access the oily bits, the whole

top half of the body shell lifted off as one piece, and it wasn't easy to find

somewhere in a crowded pit area to put the thing down! Not only that, but

being very light, it tended to blow away. Both teams reverted to conventional

open wheeled models (see top left).

Back to those engines - Ferrari had two different four-cylinder engines, the Tipo 625

developed from the 1952-3 two-litre Tipo 500 and the Tipo 553 Squalo but mixed and

matched components from both engines in both chassis over the year. Connaught used an Alta

four developed from a 1930s design, which was fast but fragile. Uniquely, the Connaught drove

through an ENV pre-selector gearbox, the last marque to use such a transmission in F1.

Maserati and Gordini had six cylinders. Both M-B and Lancia had eight cylinders. The M-B

had a straight eight laid over 30 degrees from the horizontal with desmodromic valves and

drive taken from the centre of the crankshaft. The Lancia's V8 was part of the chassis, forming

the only connection between the rear of the frame and the front suspension. Both M-B and

Lancia ran the driveshaft down the side of the cockpit to a rear transaxle, but the Lancia also

mounted the clutch at the rear, as in its road cars.

Mercedes-

Benz W196

M-B W196

Lancia D50

Ferrari Squalo

Connaught

Maserati 250F

Ferrari

Tipo 625