Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  31 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 31 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

Vol 5 No 3 June/July 2016

Australian Journal of Dementia Care

31

M

ore often than not the move into a

care home occurs when a person

with dementia experiences a

health crisis. There is probably limited

time to research the variety of competing

care homes. Cost will be a huge

consideration. Confusion will reign. Pure

luck will often be the overriding factor in

finding an aged care development that is

built and managed by an organisation that

will provide the best possible care and

environment for someone with dementia.

There are nowmany care providers

around the world who strive for that

excellence. They have researched

alternative design and methodologies and

incorporated those ideas into their own

product. However, if we were to compare

the current dementia care offer worldwide

to the phone industry, consumers are

more likely to stumble across a 1950s

Bakelite phone than an iPhone.

Slow pace of change

In the UK, for instance, it is only in the

past 12 months that the predicted

predominance of private customers

selecting their care accommodation based

on quality as well as cost has overtaken

the public sector’s demand for residential

care. Since the 1960s local government has

inadvertently contributed to this by

specifying minimum building standards

and low purchase prices. Inevitably, the

domination of one customer in the UK,

effectively the government, has dictated

the product.

Further, until perhaps the turn of the

century aged care accommodation

worldwide was not specifically designed

for a large proportion of residents to have

dementia. We mustn’t forget that we have

only really understood the complexities

and requirements of building for people

with dementia in the past 20 years or so.

Older people often resided for many years

in residential care and it would have

seemed perfectly reasonable to build

motel-like buildings with central facilities

to provide for these clients. Nowadays,

the residents occupying these facilities

have changed. Worldwide the average

occupancy is 18 months and most of the

residents will have some form and degree

of dementia. As a result, many providers

are struggling to provide a satisfactory

service in completely inappropriate

accommodation.

Innovative design

There is research and anecdotal evidence

to prove the benefits for people with

dementia of good dementia design

principles: small group households; open

plan living spaces; access to external space

and creating a domestic, familiar, non-

institutional built environment that

compensates for the impairments of

dementia.

It could be argued that new and

innovative thoughts on designing for

people with dementia started inAustralia

in the 1980s with people such as the

architect Brian Kidd, among others,

developing concepts such as open-plan

living in domestic-style environments.

Such concepts developed further across

the globe over the next decade, including

the group homes which proliferated in

Japan and the Dutch model of family-

sized households of six people sharing

two bathrooms, as any family would do.

In the UK it was 2005 before aged care

providers such as Belong began to

develop these household models based on

international examples. The St Monica

Trust near Bristol successfully

transplanted the design from an existing

WesternAustralia care home to England,

recruiting the manager fromAustralia for

good measure!

Different providers in different

countries have developed variations of

good dementia design, while still taking

into account cultural and

funding/legislative constraints. For

example:

• In the UK, creating community hubs

with facilities accessible to the general

public allows people with dementia to

still be part of the community. Social

cohesion, community and education are

all important benefits, if only on a local

basis.

• Retirement villages with different levels

of care in one campus remain popular in

the US if only due to the gargantuan size

of their development program,

particularly in the 1980s. These villages

enable people with dementia to live in a

community with other older people of

differing physical and cognitive abilities.

• Inter-generational communities and co-

operatives are taking root, particularly in

Scandinavia; families, young people,

older people and people with dementia

living and helping each other. Student

property developers have even shown an

interest in exploring a hybrid product.

• Group houses in Japan and Finland

where people with dementia live in

family-sized houses in residential

neighbourhoods.

• Dementia villages such as De

Hogeweyk in the Netherlands where

people with dementia live together in

households of six people based on their

social or religious background.

• Some Dutch care providers operate

Will good dementia design eventually prevail?

Architect

David Hughes

has been at the forefront of the debate on appropriate design for people with

dementia for several years. Using examples from around the world, including the UK and Australia, he

discusses what’s been achieved and the many challenges still ahead