Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  15 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

Research

Volume 12 No 2

I

March 2016

15

The Radiation Oncology

Research Committee is

committed to promoting the

critical importance of research

as part of good practice

through the administration of

grants and awards. In 2014, the

committee awarded the Ferring

Pharmaceuticals Research Grant

to Dr Kumar Gogna and his

team for their research study

‘A single arm, prospective Phase

II study of Split-Course Pelvic

Radiotherapy for patients with

Locally Progressive Castrate

Resistant Prostate Cancer’.

Background

In a majority of the patients with castrate

resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who

in the past have principally been

managed with androgen deprivation,

skeletal metastases usually dominate

the clinical picture. However, about

10-18 per cent

1, 2

of these patients can

present with disconcerting morbidity

from locally progressive disease, usually

characterised by significant urinary

symptoms. Some patients may also

present with pelvic pain and/or rectal

symptoms.

Managing the urinary symptoms may

require multiple surgical interventions.

Response can be short lived and repeat

procedures can be challenging. Pelvic

exenteration

3

is an option, but clearly

difficult to justify in the majority. The

effect of newer systemic therapies on

locally progressive disease has not been

defined.

Whilst there is a lack of prospective data,

the utility of pelvic radiation therapy

(RT) in effectively palliating locally

progressive CRPC is supported by a

number of retrospective case series

4-9

with most suggesting improved results

with higher doses and possibly longer

courses of treatment. This includes

our own experience with a high dose

hypo-fractionated split course regimen

10

based on the following principles:

• Prostate cancer has a low

α

/

β

ratio

and therefore one would anticipate

a better response with hypo-

fractionation.

• A break in treatment may assist in

minimising acute toxicity. Accelerated

re-population

11

is usually not an issue

with prostate cancer and therefore

unlikely to compromise local control.

• Overall treatment is shortened and

inconvenience to patients and carers is

minimised.

• If clinically dictated, the second half

of RT course may be omitted in the

knowledge that the initial course is

likely to provide some benefit at least

in the short term

12

.

Summary

The current Phase II trial is a single

arm locally based study designed

to prospectively investigate the split

course regimen further with the

hypothesis being that it (i) results in

improved bladder and bowel related

quality of life (measured on the EPIC

QoL instrument),

12

(ii) has low acute

toxicity, (iii) is effective and results in a

durable response, and (iv) further local

interventions are likely to be minimised.

Treatment Regimen:

3D conformal RT/IMRT: 55Gy in 22

fractions given as two courses of

25Gy and 30Gy in 10 and 12 fractions

respectively separated by a one week

treatment break.

The initial aim is to accrue 20 patients

and based on the results, the

subsequent plan would be to undertake

an extended study either in its original

format or with modifications through the

auspices of the Trans-Tasman Radiation

Oncology Group and the ANZUP Cancer

Trials Group.

To date, 10 patients have been accrued

and it is hoped that the target accrual

will be reached in 12-15 months’ time.

Study Aims to Progress

Prostate Cancer Treatment

continued over...