Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  20 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

20

Australian Journal of Dementia Care

December 2016/January 2017 Vol 5 No 6

Available at:

http://fada.kingston.ac.uk/de/MSE_

design_in_dementia_care/doc/How%20to%20m

ake%2Qa%2 0Sensory%20Room%20for%20

people%20With%20dementia.pdf

Johnson R, Elliott A (2006) Using multi-sensory

prompts as a means of communication: working

with individuals who have Down’s syndrome and

dementia.

Downs Syndrome Association Journal

11221-11222.

Johnson R, Elliott A (2008) Sensory prompts and

dementia.

Down’s Syndrome Association Journal

118 24-25.

Jones J (2000) A total communication approach

towards meeting the needs of people with

learning disabilities.

Tizard Learning Disability

Review

5(1) 20-26.

Kindell J, Burrow S, Wilkinson R, Keady JD

(2014) Life story resources in dementia care: a

review.

Quality in Ageing and Older Adults

15(3)

151-161.

Lacey P (2006) Inclusive Literacy.

PMLD Link

18

(3, 18) 11-13.

Longhorn F (2011) A short history of shout, glow,

jump, taste, smell, touch and wobble.

PMLD Link

23 (1, 88) 32-33.

Mansell J (2010)

Raising our sights: services for

adults with profound intellectual and multiple

disabilities.

London: Department of Health.

Mencap (2014)

About profound and multiple

learning disabilities: factsheet.

London: Mencap.

McKeown J, Clarke A, Rapper J (2006) Lifestory

work in health and social care: systematic

literature review.

Journal of Advanced Nursing

55

237-247.

McKeown J, Ryan T, Ingleton C, Clarke A (2015)

You have to be mindful of whose story it is: the

challenges of undertaking life story work with

people with dementia and their family carers.

Dementia 14(2) 238-256.

Pagliano P (2008)

MSE definition.

Presentation at

6th international Snoezelen symposium,

Neuwied, Germany.

PAMIS (2002)

Real lives: real stories

. Summary of

results leaflet. University of Dundee.

Park K (2004) Interactive storytelling: from the

Book of Genesis.

British Journal of Special

Education

31(1) 16-23.

Penne A

et al

(2012) Staff interactive style during

multisensory storytelling with persons with

profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.

Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

56(2)

167-178.

Raphael C, Clark M (2011) Christian.

PMLD Link

23 (1, 88) 18-21.

Royal College of Speech and Language

Therapists (2013)

Position paper: speech and

language therapy provision for people with

dementia.

London: RCSLT

Schweitzer P, Bruce E (2008)

Remembering

yesterday, caring today: reminiscence in

dementia care: a guide to good practice.

London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Taylor J (2006) Using multi-sensory stories to

develop literacy skills and to teach sensitive

topics.

PMLD Link

18(3, 18) 14-16.

Young H, Lambe L (2011) Multi-sensory story

telling for people with profound and multiple

learning disabilities.

PMLD Link

23 (1, 88) 29-31.

Whatever approach is taken to sensory storytelling, two

considerations are essential: stimulus selection and sensitivity.

Stimulus selection

The choice of stimuli is centrally important; careful, person-specific

and dementia-specific selection is key. This choice is not

necessarily focused on the progression of sensory development as

it might be in supporting individuals with PMLD (although this is a

potential outcome which might be explored in research). Rather, it

is focused on recall and pre-existing associations, on finding stimuli

which are strong memory triggers and which are not distressing or

confusing (nor likely to become so as dementia progresses).

Identifying strong memory triggers can be difficult, particularly if the

person has limited verbal ability to relate their memories, but thinking

creatively tends to get results.

Breaking tasks down is a good starting point – if the person liked

baking, explore the sensory elements of each stage of baking

(stirring or kneading actions, feel of flour, smell of vanilla essence,

taste of icing) and observe their responses.

This type of process revealed, for example, that using a bicycle

pump was a great kinaesthetic experience for prompting Shah* to

talk about the cycling races he won as a young adult.

An assessment or activity to establish the person’s sensory

preferences is a wise step, so that the experience is an enjoyable

and meaningful one:

• Is the person calmer with firm or light touch?

• Do loud sounds frighten them?

• Do they love sweet tastes?

Occupational therapy assessments are often excellent sources of

guidance for selecting personalised sensory stimuli; alternatively,

tools may be found in Fowler (2007) and Grace (2014).

Personalising stimuli is of course more challenging in group

storytelling, but tweaking the experiences to fit each group member

is not insurmountable.

Consideration of general sensory features of dementia is equally

important. Progressive neuronal changes affect the way sensory

stimuli are processed and experienced (Baker

et al

2003). For

example, mirrors and abstract projected images may be confusing

(Hope & Waterman 2004). Smells, on the other hand, are likely to

be successful stimuli because they are the only form of sensory

information to remain indefinitely once encoded (Johnson & Elliot

2006).

Readers are directed to Jakob & Collier (2014) for further

information.

Sensitivity

Sensitivity is essential in all aspects of sensory story work. As in

all life story or reminiscence work, there is potential for traumatic

memories to arise and the practitioner should be prepared for this.

There is also a need to consider how the rather reductive act of

condensing someone’s life memories into eight to 10 sentences

might be experienced.

Having an example of a sensory story helps to introduce the

concept. Great sensitivity is required in discussing likely

deterioration in verbal communication and increasing need for

more multi-sensory, non-verbal supports. Talking about those

abilities that might be maintained through sensory stories (for

example, continued potential for sharing memories and

connecting with family and friends) is a more positive approach.

Finally, storytelling can be viewed as ‘for children’ and it can help

to focus on sharing stories rather than being told a story.

A ‘story tree’ can visually record stories that arise during group

storytelling sessions and become a talking point for visitors and

care-givers.

Sensory stories may not be appropriate for everyone and they are not

posited here as a replacement for any existing approach. Rather, they

are an addition to the toolbox of approaches that can be used to

support people with dementia, chosen where it is clinically indicated

and fits with the person’s own goals.

Sensory storytelling: points for practice