Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  37 / 66 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 66 Next Page
Page Background

35

Audit period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2015.

Data not available: n=7 (<1%).

Table 6: Time frame in which the clinically significant infection was acquired.

Infection time frame

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

2014-2015 Audit period

Freq. (%)

Freq. (%)

Freq. (%)

Freq. (%)

Freq. (%)

Acquired preoperatively

15 (13.2%)

38 (21.2%)

24 (14.2%)

18 (14.1%)

95 (16.1%)

Surgical-site infection

11 (9.6%)

8 (4.5%)

12 (7.1%)

5 (3.9%)

36 (6.1%)

Acquired postoperatively

72 (63.2%)

124 (69.3%)

128 (75.7%)

100 (78.1%)

424 (71.9%)

Note: total n=1,046 patients with 590 incidences of noted infections and 128 of these were reported in 2014-2015.

Audit period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2015.

Data not available: n=7 (<1%).

Freq: frequency.

Comments:

The time frame when the infection was acquired can play a role in the patient’s recovery following the surgical

procedure.

Infection was reported in 28.4% (1,046/3,679) cases audited since the data collection commenced for infections.

The infection rate between emergency and elective admissions varies between 18.1% and 40.0% respectively.

Pneumonia and septicaemia comprised 73.9% (773/1,046) of the cases where infection was identified of these

cases 47.1% (364/773) were acquired postoperatively

The infection rate across specialties varied, reflecting the casemix of individual specialties.

The infective organisms identified were:

Clostridium difficile, Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter

aerogenes, Enterococcus, Klebsiella, Lactobacillus,

Methicillin-resistant

Staphylococcus aureus,

Methicillin-

sensitive

Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus

aureus, Varicella

, yeast and mixed organisms.

Strategies for implementing surgical site infections surveillance have been implemented overseas

(19)

and in

Australia.

(20)

A standardised surgical site infections surveillance method was implemented in Victoria in 2002. Since

implementation, a research study found a need to facilitate the refinement of recommended surgical antibiotic

prophylaxis regimens and expand surveillance strategies on a national level.

(20)

7.1%

Surgical-site infections of the

infection cohort

2012-2014

3.9%

Surgical-site infections of the

infection cohort

2014-2015